🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial action to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of nations are exploring comparable measures.

• The Danish government has announced a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that phones and platforms are "stealing our kids' youth". A law may be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media users. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has asked lawmakers to enact a law increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is given. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a good foundation," stated the parliamentarian supporting the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any action must be "grounded in robust research".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the administration committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. An organization founded by the family of a teenager who took her own life after viewing harmful social media material suggests that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to build tools that are secure and fit for children," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, legislation is largely unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law barring under-14s from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with additional time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced measures requiring parental consent for minors to open social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from certain politicians to copy the Australian path, a US-wide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of the West, further nations are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international agencies strike a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even backfire". The organization notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in safety.

While this worldwide discussion unfolds, the steps of the Australian government and its followers indicate that states globally are less and less content to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.